All The King's Men (2006)

Who's In It: Sean Penn, Jude Law, Kate Winslet, Patricia Clarkson
James Gandolfini, Anthony Hopkins
Who Directed It: Steve Zaillian

Year of release: 2006


All The King's Men (2006) Movie Review
Reviewed by
: The Boneman , Zboneman.com

All the King's Men will not be a film without its many detractors. Some will present convincing cases that this renovation is somewhat tepid and toothless, compared to Robert Penn Warren's 1946 Pulitzer honored novel (which was subsequently made into a much more energetic indictment of a film by Robert Rossen) which took home the best Pictue Oscar in '49. Certainly neither film measure up to the book - Warren's prose is at once immediate and frank while undeniably poetic in it's insight and daring. Notable perhaps more for it's unflinching misogyny, than for it thinly veiled pot-shots at Huey Long's legendary political machinations and societal revelations. Though I have a few gripes about Sean Penn's passionate, if not a tad studied performance, I suppose his name will be bandied about come award season. I find myself once again on the horns of a strange dilemma although this one is far more easy to defend than my previuos theory.

Though I did get a fair amount of support for my contention that Charlize Theron channelled Michael Keaton's Beetlejuice heavily in her Oscar-winning performance as a tough as nails, murderous lesbian prostitute in Monster. In particular the scene where she pushes over a hapless bar-denizen and then stands there taunting him - it's all Beetlejuice. All the Kings Men features similar channeling - any time Sean Penn gets rolling on his bully pulpit he goes through the same wild frugging and freaky gestculations as the great Joe Cocker. It's a good performance all around and to be honest the Joe Cocker impression didn't necessarily bother me, but watch for it. One time years ago John Belushi stood beside Cocker on the SNL stage and did his impression right alongside Cocker on "Feelin' Alright" Penn would have been right at home between them.

Penn's Willie Stark starts off as a small time man-of-the-people sort of politician from a poverty stricken southern state who's approached by a flunkie from a rival camp (James Gandolfini). Gandolfini has come to pump the shinola up Stark's skirt, flattering him into believing that he's got a real shot at the Governor's race and outlining a strategy and a means of financial support that at first Penn finds plausible. It isn't long, however, before he comes to the realization that he's being duped and all his campaign is accomplishing is to divide the opposition vote to the benefit of the candidate that Gandolfini's in league with. Rather than knuckling under he changes his campaign to one based on absolute candor that strikes a favorable chord with the voters and villifies everyone running against him. One particularly moving scene involves Penn addressing a group of blue collar voters asking them to give him the hammer so he can "nail 'em up," ('em being the old guard politicians who cater to the wealthy and scarcely even pay lip service to the poor and down-trodden. He calls them off by name and says give me the hammer and I'll "nail 'em up." Not only does he win the election but the lifelong support of Gandolfini who really turns in a beautiful performance as a self-effacing toady.

Also caught up in Stark's cult of personality is a political journalist with a nose for populist phenomena - a well-known and honored journalist by the name of Jack Burden (Jude Law). Law not only plays the chief window character to Stark, but it could be argued that Burden is the true lead. It is Burden who narrates the film and as such becomes the audiences surrogate. He is eventually seduced away from the Newspaper and accepts a advisory postition in Starks inner circle and one of the strengths of the film arises from Penn and Law's struggle for the most significant performance in the film.

Burden's love relationship with Kate Winslet at times hijacks the narrative, a relationship that isn't quite compelling enough to justify the digression it represents from the real substance of the story - and I think that a lack of substance is probably going to be where a lot of critics will seek to hang this film. Winslet is solid, but it becomes obvious that much of the story invoving her and her troubled brother (an idealistic doctor played by Mark Ruffalo) have been sliced and diced in the interest of trimming the running time and as a result the ending certainly fails to resonate like writer/director Steve Zaillian's cut is likey to. Add to this, a good bit of cornball imagery during the ending that's heavy handed and certainly unsatisfying. I also felt like the studio might have asked Zaillian to dumb the film down some - case in point near the end, blame for a certain bit of indiscreet gossip was put forth and then they cut for a moment to each of the possible candidates for such hurtful intentions. Which was a bit of an insult to anyone with double digit IQ points.

There's no question that Penn is the driving charismatic force behind the film, Anthony Hopkins and Particia Clarkson are as reliable as ever, but this is really a tour de force for Penn. It's just one of those tailor made roles where you can't take your eyes off of him - his Joe Cocker pulpit histrionics notwithstanding. With former Clinton advisor James Carville on board as a technical advisor, there will be some who will ascribe some of Willie Stark to Willie Clinton, there definitley are similarities, but to go into detail would tread spoiler territory. With the allusion to Huey Long it will come as no spoiler that the gist of the narrative revolves around the corrupting influence of power, and the parchment thin division between idealism and opportunism. Still I expected a much more pointed film, with much more inspired and overt polemics, whereas most of the drama arises from dark matters of the heart. Which to me is something of a double-edged sword, on the one hand I expected there to be more historical substance, on the other hand I liked the way Zaillian kept the film from taking itself so seriously. I think this will be the crux of the films criticism. I screened the film a lot earlier than most, but if I'm betting, I don't think it will do much better than a collective C, maybe C+ - but I've got a feeling that as good a writer and director as Zaillian is, that he'll release a directors DVD cut that will redeem it.

Grade: B-

ADVERTISEMENT

 

More Movie Reviews || Movie News || Coming Soon

 

Search The Site
 
Web www.thehollywoodnews.com


 
THN REVIEWS with Zboneman.com

 
 

Bet Now with William Hill

 
 

HOME || NEWS || CELEBRITY NEWS || COMING SOON || TRAILERS || REVIEWS || CONTESTS || DVD REVIEWS
AWARDS || MAILING LIST || LINKS || ABOUT || SITE MAP || CONTACT

The Hollywood News is hosted by Nexcess.net.

Site content © 2006 The Hollywood News, www.thehollywoodnews.com.
All information and images on this website are (c) to their respected owners where stated.
This site has no intention to infringe on the rights of any intellectual copyright holders of any property, film or images listed or featured.