Who's
In It: Simon Baker, Dennis Hopper, John Leguizamo Who Directed It:
George A. Romero
Year of release: 2005
George A. Romero's Land Of The Dead (2005)
Movie Review Reviewed by: Adam Mast,
Zboneman.com
Land
of the Dead is a smart horror film, and while Im sure this will no doubt
evoke laughter from many readers out there, I have to say that I was every bit
as excited to see this new zombie epic as I was at the prospect of seeing Revenge
of the Sith. Why? Because director George A. Romero is a true pioneer in very
much the same way as George Lucas. He too is an independent film maker in every
sense of the word.
And
notice that the title isnt Land of the Dead, but rather George A. Romeros
Land of the Dead. A fair title given that Mr. Romero is the godfather of the zombie
picture. But what really sets this brilliant independent film maker and horror
meister apart from his vast array of imitators is his crafty ability to lace his
undead works with social commentary.
Night
of the Living Dead, while truly terrifying, works on several levels. What makes
the monsters in this film so horrific is the knowledge that theyre us. They
arent hockey mask-wearing maniacs, chainsaw-wielding sociopaths, or razor
glove sporting ghouls (this isnt to say I dont like those particular
films - far from it). They are quite simply us. But whats more, Romero makes
bold statements about race and Vietnam era inspired paranoia. The end result is
a chilling tale of survival - shot on the cheap, but effective beyond belief.
Dawn
of the Dead (my personal favorite of the series, and one of the best horror films
of all time for that matter) took things even further. In that film, living humans
are quickly becoming the minority, as the undead rise to incredible numbers. Once
again, Romero shocks and scares with one of the most gleefully gory films in history,
but he also forces the audience to think in what is essentially a shrewd satire
on consumerism. Zombies are drawn to the same thing they were drawn to in life,
so the notion that the undead are drawn to the mall is downright hilarious. Dawn
of the Dead is punctuated with an ominous sense of dread that remains unmatched.
Whenever I watch that film, I feel, in a sense, like Im witnessing the end
of the world. An amazing piece of work.
Day
of the Dead is often the most debated film of the series. While it does offer
up some truly breathtaking make up effects, it suffers from a sluggish pace and
obvious budgetary problems. Does this make "Day" a lousy film? Hell
no. Theres a terrific sub plot involving a domesticated zombie name Bub,
and the fate that awaits the villainous military man at the end of the film is
one Ill never forget. Day of the Dead is a movie made up of moments while
"Night" and "Dawn" work as a whole. Still, it does deliver
on many levels.
This
brings us to Land of the Dead, an entertaining, crowd pleasing slice of zombie
pleasure that excels where crap like Resident Evil and House of the Dead fail
miserably. Where Romero begins this film, feels like the next, logical evolutionary
step. As was the case in the last two films, the zombies are clearly the majority
now, but unlike "Dawn" and "Day, this time around, theyre
more of an obstacle. Thats not to say that people and zombies co-exist,
but the living have certainly found a way to adapt. Not only that, but, as is
typical with the human race, people have once again broken into various social
classes. You have your rich folk and you have your poor folk, and neither are
terribly fond of each other. The plot line revolves around loner Riley (played
by Simon Baker who rebounds nicely from his blank of a performance in The Ring
Two) and his team of salvagers. They cruise around in a mighty tank deemed "Dead
Reckoning" forraging for supplies. The true villain of the story is rich
mogul Kaufman (a playful Dennis Hopper). He believes that money makes the world
go around and has enough cash to back up his theory. When a poor but tough scavenger
(played by John Leguizamo) revolts against Kaufman and steels "Dead Reckoning,"
Riley is brought in to prevent further disaster.
Meanwhile,
the undead have taken an evolutionary step of their own. Lead by a dead gas station
attendant named Big Daddy, the zombies are starting to become free thinkers. No,
they cant drive cars or utter Shakespearean dialogue nor do they run around
like the ghouls in that overrated Dawn of the Dead remake (a movie that trades
horror satire in for Michael Bay style action), but they are becoming more self
aware, and in fact, Big Daddy even begins to feel sympathy for his mistreated
brothers.
Land
of the Dead clearly has a bigger budget than the other Romero zombie pictures,
and God bless Universal Pictures for allowing this film maker to realize his vision.
They obviously recognized that Romero created the zombie genre as we know it,
and theyve given him the proper tools to tell the story he wants to tell.
Furthermore,
God bless Universal for not skimping on the gore. Make effects artist Greg Nicotero
(who dropped out of school to work on Day of the Dead - an absolute genius) goes
off like a mad man, and the end result will have gore hounds grinning from ear
to ear. There are many great shots to speak of, but Im not going to because
I hate spoilers. Lets just say that the audience erupted in cheers on several
occasions. Unlike the previously mentioned "Dawn" remake, this picture
has many scenes in which people are served up for dinner. Were talking blood
by the gallons people. Youre going to love it.
As
usual, Romero spikes his tale with social commentary, and in the case of Land
of the Dead, a post 9/11 world is clearly the inspiration. And while there are
decent people to be found in this movie, most of the human race appears to be
driven by selfishness. In terms of technique, Romero walks that fine line between
horror and comedy, effortlessly. Land of the Dead has great scares, but it also
has a wicked sense of humor. This film is painted on a much bigger canvas than
one might expect. One of my very favorite shots in the picture features hundreds
of zombies emerging from the depths of a dark, watery beach. Its a great
image.
If I must
compare this outing to the others, Id say that its better than "Day"
but not quite on par with "Night" and "Land." Romero certainly
takes elements that worked in those pictures and applies them here (legendary
effects artist Tom Savini even gets in on the act), but the tone that was so prominent
in the first two movies isnt quite as potent this time around. I also expected
a bigger, more grandiose death for a major character in the film.
Still,
its exciting to have Romero back. While his return to the zombie genre isnt
quite as clever as last years creative Shaun of the Dead (watch for a cameo
by "Shaun" creators Edgar Wright and Simon Pegg) it is worlds
better than the countless (and worthless) other zombie pictures weve seen
in recent years (note to horror fans; I dont consider Danny Boyles
outstanding 28 Days Later a zombie movie even though it was clearly inspired by
Romeros works). And Wright and Pegg will be the first to tell you, had it
not been for Romero, "Shaun" never would have been born. Land of the
Dead proves that this veteran film maker still has it.