|
House of Wax (2005)
Movie Review: By Adam Mast, ZBoneMan.com
House of Wax certainly bears scant resemblance to the 1953 thriller starring
Vincent Price. All the two films really have in common is the title. This crappy
update (which didnt even have the common sense to go the 3-D route) doesnt
really come alive until the final half hour, and even then its barely worth
discussing.

In
this new remake from Robert Zemeckis and Joel Silvers Dark Castle Productions,
a group of twenty somethings (lead by 24's Elisha Cuthbert and perhaps the least
talented woman in America Paris Hilton) are sidetracked by car trouble
on their way to a football game in the big city. The need for a car part causes
Cuthbert and her boyfriend to poke around in a small, mysterious town populated
by wax figures. Quite naturally, their lives are cast into grave peril, and before
long, the dark secret of the nearly deserted town is revealed. The
first hour of this movie is excruciatingly awful. Were not talking mere
crap - were talking a burning case of the runs. The movie has pacing problems,
introduces us to characters that have zero personality (thankfully, most of them
get it by the end of the movie), and offers up cheap laughs (including repeated
scenes in which Paris Hilton is caught on video taped making out with her boyfriend).
It wasnt even funny the first time. What bugged me the most however, is
the fact that nothing is really happening. Literally nothing. Once
Elisha Cuthbert finally comes face to face with villain of the tale (at about
the one hour point), House of Wax finally starts to generate a little bit of tension
(albeit familiar tension) and in fact, there were a couple of moments that made
me squirm (including a cringe-inducing bit that involves a pair of pliers). The
performances are every bit as forgettable as much of the movie. Cuthbert spends
the entire film screaming and running from the bad guy. Paris Hiltons involvement
appears to be a gag of sorts. Every time shes on screen, shes the
butt of the joke and her inevitable fate in the picture evoked big time applause
from the audience. Im curious as to whether or not Hilton was actually in
on the joke when she agreed to star in the movie, or if she actually thought her
character was an integral part of the plot. Forget
about the screenplay. There isnt one. This movie is disjointed beyond belief,
and the fashion in which the writers explain things, is beyond stupid. Take for
instance the idea that no one knows this town exists. The half-baked explanation
(offered by a couple of police officers at the end of the film) reminded me of
a similar revelation in The Village, only M. Night Shyamalan wasnt as dim-witted
about it. The
saddest part of the picture is the real possibility that there might have actually
been a good movie jumbled up in all this. The films primary villain could
have been a tragic, sympathetic kind of figure in the same vein as Phantom of
the Opera or Frankensteins monster, but the films insipid screenplay
never allows him to be anything more than your garden variety slasher. Whats
more, House of Wax appears more interested in focusing on another more obvious
villain. First
time director Jaume Serra shows some terrific touches in the final act of the
movie and he avoids the MTV style editing rampant in so many horror pictures as
of late. Theres some outstanding make-up effects, a couple of moments that
made me squirm, and a very cool bit where two of our fearless heroes try to escape
a melting house. I couldnt figure out why they werent being burned
by the boiling wax, but suspension of disbelief is always key when watching a
film like this. At any rate, there are so many holes in this House of Cards that
the boiling wax thing seems pretty trivial. House
of Wax really isnt a very good movie but there was enough visual bravado
and horrific carnage in the final act to make this more effective than The Amityville
Horror. This is garbage, but like most garbage, theres usually something
interesting or bizarre in the dumpster. Grade:
C
Adam
Mast, ZBoneMan.com
|